Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:15

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Amazon launches new R&D group focused on agentic AI and robotics - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
YouTube Will Add an AI Slop Button Thanks to Google’s Veo 3 - Gizmodo
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Fifth measles case in Georgia confirmed in family member of person with earlier case - 11Alive.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Do all therapists specialize in one specific type of therapy, or are they trained in multiple types?
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is the most inappropriate experience you have had with a friend's daughter?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Indiana Pacers assistant Lloyd Pierce taking lessons for next opportunity as head coach - Andscape